洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social

1,075 following1,882 followers

An intersectionalist, feminist, and socialist living in Seoul (UTC+09:00). @tokolovesme's spouse. Who's behind @fedify, @hollo, and @botkit. Write some free software in , , , & . They/them.

서울에 사는 交叉女性主義者이자 社會主義者. 金剛兔(@tokolovesme)의 配偶者. @fedify, @hollo, @botkit 메인테이너. , , , 等으로 自由 소프트웨어 만듦.

()

Pinned

@hongminhee@hollo.social

Hello! I'm Hong Minhee (洪 民憙), an open source software engineer in my late 30s, living in Seoul, Korea. I'm bisexual and non-binary (they/them), and an enthusiastic advocate of free/open source software and the fediverse.

I work full-time on @fedify, an ActivityPub server framework in TypeScript, funded by @sovtechfund. I'm also the creator of @hollo, a single-user ActivityPub microblog; @botkit, an ActivityPub bot framework; Hackers' Pub, a fediverse platform for software developers; and LogTape, a logging library for JavaScript and TypeScript.

I have a long interest in East Asian languages (CJK) and Unicode. I post mostly in English here, though occasionally in Japanese or in mixed-script Korean (國漢文混用體), a traditional writing style that interleaves Chinese characters with the native Korean alphabet. Wanting to write in that style was actually one of the reasons I joined the fediverse. Feel free to talk to me in English, Korean, Japanese, or even Literary Chinese!

en.wikipedia.org

Korean mixed script - Wikipedia

Pinned

はじめまして!ソウル在住の30代後半のオープンソースソフトウェアエンジニア、洪 民憙ホン・ミンヒと申します。バイセクシュアル(bisexual)・ノンバイナリー(non-binary)で、自由・オープンソースソフトウェア(F/OSS)とフェディバース(fediverse)の熱烈な支持者です。

STF(@sovtechfund)の支援を受け、TypeScript用ActivityPubサーバーフレームワーク「@fedify」の開発に専念しています。他にも、おひとり様向けのActivityPubマイクロブログ「@hollo」、ActivityPubボットフレームワーク「@botkit」、ソフトウェア開発者向けフェディバースプラットフォームHackers' Pub、JavaScript・TypeScript用ロギングライブラリLogTapeなどの制作者でもあります。

東アジア言語(いわゆるCJK)とUnicodeにも興味があります。このアカウントでは主に英語で投稿していますが、時々日本語や国漢文混用体(漢字ハングル混じり文)の韓国語でも書いています。実はこの文体で書きたくてフェディバースを始めた、という経緯もあります。日本語、英語、韓国語、漢文でも気軽に話しかけてください!

speakerdeck.com

国漢文混用体からHolloまで

本発表では、韓国語の「国漢文混用体」(漢字ハングル混じり文)を自分のフェディバース投稿に実装したいという小さな目標から始まった旅路を共有します。 この目標を達成するために、ActivityPubのJSON-LDの複雑さやHTTP Signatures、WebFingerなどの仕様を理解する必要性に…

Pinned

安寧(안녕)하세요! 저는 서울에 살고 있는 30() 後半(후반)의 오픈 소스 소프트웨어 엔지니어 洪民憙(홍민희)입니다. 兩性愛者(양성애자)(bisexual)이자 논바이너리(non-binary)이며, 自由(자유)·오픈 소스 소프트웨어(F/OSS)와 聯合宇宙(연합우주)(fediverse)의 熱烈(열렬)支持者(지지자)이기도 합니다.

STF(@sovtechfund)의 支援(지원)을 받아 TypeScript() ActivityPub 서버 프레임워크 @fedify 開發(개발)專業(전업)으로 ()하고 있습니다. 그 ()에도 싱글 유저() ActivityPub 마이크로블로그 @hollo, ActivityPub 봇 프레임워크 @botkit, 소프트웨어 開發者(개발자)를 위한 聯合宇宙(연합우주) 플랫폼 Hackers' Pub, JavaScript·TypeScript() 로깅 라이브러리 LogTape ()製作者(제작자)이기도 합니다.

()아시아 言語(언어)(이른바 CJK)와 Unicode에도 關心(관심)이 많습니다. 이 計定(계정)에서는 ()英語(영어)로 포스팅하지만, 때때로 日本語(일본어)國漢文混用體(국한문 혼용체) 韓國語(한국어)로도 씁니다. 聯合宇宙(연합우주)에 오게 된 動機(동기) () 하나가 바로 國漢文混用體(국한문 혼용체)로 글을 쓰고 싶었기 때문이기도 하고요. 韓國語(한국어), 英語(영어), 日本語(일본어), 아니면 漢文(한문)으로도 말을 걸어주세요!

logtape.org

LogTape

Unobtrusive logging library with zero dependencies—library-first design for Deno, Node.js, Bun, browsers, and edge functions

@lobsters@mastodon.social

hackers.pub

Your CLI's completion should know what options you've already typed

Consider Git's -C option: git -C /path/to/repo checkout <TAB> When you hit Tab, Git completes branch names from /path/to/repo, not yourcurrent directory. The completion is context-aware—it depends on the value ofanother option. Most CLI parsers can't do this. They treat each option in isolation, socompletion for --branch has no way of knowing the --repo value. You end upwith two unpleasant choices: either show completions for all possiblebranches across all repositories (useless), or give up on completion entirelyfor these options. Optique 0.10.0 introduces a dependency system that solves this problem whilepreserving full type safety. Static dependencies with or() Optique already handles certain kinds of dependent options via the or()combinator: import { flag, object, option, or, string } from "@optique/core";const outputOptions = or( object({ json: flag("--json"), pretty: flag("--pretty"), }), object({ csv: flag("--csv"), delimiter: option("--delimiter", string()), }),); TypeScript knows that if json is true, you'll have a pretty field, and ifcsv is true, you'll have a delimiter field. The parser enforces this atruntime, and shell completion will suggest --pretty only when --json ispresent. This works well when the valid combinations are known at definition time. Butit can't handle cases where valid values depend on runtime input—likebranch names that vary by repository. Runtime dependencies Common scenarios include: A deployment CLI where --environment affects which services are available A database tool where --connection affects which tables can be completed A cloud CLI where --project affects which resources are shown In each case, you can't know the valid values until you know what the usertyped for the dependency option. Optique 0.10.0 introduces dependency() andderive() to handle exactly this. The dependency system The core idea is simple: mark one option as a dependency source, then createderived parsers that use its value. import { choice, dependency, message, object, option, string,} from "@optique/core";function getRefsFromRepo(repoPath: string): string[] { // In real code, this would read from the Git repository return ["main", "develop", "feature/login"];}// Mark as a dependency sourceconst repoParser = dependency(string());// Create a derived parserconst refParser = repoParser.derive({ metavar: "REF", factory: (repoPath) => { const refs = getRefsFromRepo(repoPath); return choice(refs); }, defaultValue: () => ".",});const parser = object({ repo: option("--repo", repoParser, { description: message`Path to the repository`, }), ref: option("--ref", refParser, { description: message`Git reference`, }),}); The factory function is where the dependency gets resolved. It receives theactual value the user provided for --repo and returns a parser that validatesagainst refs from that specific repository. Under the hood, Optique uses a three-phase parsing strategy: Parse all options in a first pass, collecting dependency values Call factory functions with the collected values to create concrete parsers Re-parse derived options using those dynamically created parsers This means both validation and completion work correctly—if the user hasalready typed --repo /some/path, the --ref completion will show refs fromthat path. Repository-aware completion with @optique/git The @optique/git package provides async value parsers that read from Gitrepositories. Combined with the dependency system, you can build CLIs withrepository-aware completion: import { command, dependency, message, object, option, string,} from "@optique/core";import { gitBranch } from "@optique/git";const repoParser = dependency(string());const branchParser = repoParser.deriveAsync({ metavar: "BRANCH", factory: (repoPath) => gitBranch({ dir: repoPath }), defaultValue: () => ".",});const checkout = command( "checkout", object({ repo: option("--repo", repoParser, { description: message`Path to the repository`, }), branch: option("--branch", branchParser, { description: message`Branch to checkout`, }), }),); Now when you type my-cli checkout --repo /path/to/project --branch <TAB>, thecompletion will show branches from /path/to/project. The defaultValue of"." means that if --repo isn't specified, it falls back to the currentdirectory. Multiple dependencies Sometimes a parser needs values from multiple options. The deriveFrom()function handles this: import { choice, dependency, deriveFrom, message, object, option,} from "@optique/core";function getAvailableServices(env: string, region: string): string[] { return [`${env}-api-${region}`, `${env}-web-${region}`];}const envParser = dependency(choice(["dev", "staging", "prod"] as const));const regionParser = dependency(choice(["us-east", "eu-west"] as const));const serviceParser = deriveFrom({ dependencies: [envParser, regionParser] as const, metavar: "SERVICE", factory: (env, region) => { const services = getAvailableServices(env, region); return choice(services); }, defaultValues: () => ["dev", "us-east"] as const,});const parser = object({ env: option("--env", envParser, { description: message`Deployment environment`, }), region: option("--region", regionParser, { description: message`Cloud region`, }), service: option("--service", serviceParser, { description: message`Service to deploy`, }),}); The factory receives values in the same order as the dependency array. Ifsome dependencies aren't provided, Optique uses the defaultValues. Async support Real-world dependency resolution often involves I/O—reading from Gitrepositories, querying APIs, accessing databases. Optique provides asyncvariants for these cases: import { dependency, string } from "@optique/core";import { gitBranch } from "@optique/git";const repoParser = dependency(string());const branchParser = repoParser.deriveAsync({ metavar: "BRANCH", factory: (repoPath) => gitBranch({ dir: repoPath }), defaultValue: () => ".",}); The @optique/git package uses isomorphic-git under the hood, sogitBranch(), gitTag(), and gitRef() all work in both Node.js and Deno. There's also deriveSync() for when you need to be explicit about synchronousbehavior, and deriveFromAsync() for multiple async dependencies. Wrapping up The dependency system lets you build CLIs where options are aware of eachother—not just for validation, but for shell completion too. You get typesafety throughout: TypeScript knows the relationship between your dependencysources and derived parsers, and invalid combinations are caught at compiletime. This is particularly useful for tools that interact with external systems wherethe set of valid values isn't known until runtime. Git repositories, cloudproviders, databases, container registries—anywhere the completion choicesdepend on context the user has already provided. This feature will be available in Optique 0.10.0. To try the pre-release: deno add jsr:@optique/core@0.10.0-dev.311 Or with npm: npm install @optique/core@0.10.0-dev.311 See the documentation for more details.

@hongminhee@hollo.social

When building CLI tools, shell completion usually treats each option in isolation. But sometimes valid values for one option depend on another—like branch names depending on which repository you're targeting.

Wrote about how I solved this in Optique, a type-safe CLI parser for TypeScript.

https://hackers.pub/@hongminhee/2026/optique-context-aware-cli-completion

hackers.pub

Your CLI's completion should know what options you've already typed

Consider Git's -C option: git -C /path/to/repo checkout <TAB> When you hit Tab, Git completes branch names from /path/to/repo, not yourcurrent directory. The completion is context-aware—it depends on the value ofanother option. Most CLI parsers can't do this. They treat each option in isolation, socompletion for --branch has no way of knowing the --repo value. You end upwith two unpleasant choices: either show completions for all possiblebranches across all repositories (useless), or give up on completion entirelyfor these options. Optique 0.10.0 introduces a dependency system that solves this problem whilepreserving full type safety. Static dependencies with or() Optique already handles certain kinds of dependent options via the or()combinator: import { flag, object, option, or, string } from "@optique/core";const outputOptions = or( object({ json: flag("--json"), pretty: flag("--pretty"), }), object({ csv: flag("--csv"), delimiter: option("--delimiter", string()), }),); TypeScript knows that if json is true, you'll have a pretty field, and ifcsv is true, you'll have a delimiter field. The parser enforces this atruntime, and shell completion will suggest --pretty only when --json ispresent. This works well when the valid combinations are known at definition time. Butit can't handle cases where valid values depend on runtime input—likebranch names that vary by repository. Runtime dependencies Common scenarios include: A deployment CLI where --environment affects which services are available A database tool where --connection affects which tables can be completed A cloud CLI where --project affects which resources are shown In each case, you can't know the valid values until you know what the usertyped for the dependency option. Optique 0.10.0 introduces dependency() andderive() to handle exactly this. The dependency system The core idea is simple: mark one option as a dependency source, then createderived parsers that use its value. import { choice, dependency, message, object, option, string,} from "@optique/core";function getRefsFromRepo(repoPath: string): string[] { // In real code, this would read from the Git repository return ["main", "develop", "feature/login"];}// Mark as a dependency sourceconst repoParser = dependency(string());// Create a derived parserconst refParser = repoParser.derive({ metavar: "REF", factory: (repoPath) => { const refs = getRefsFromRepo(repoPath); return choice(refs); }, defaultValue: () => ".",});const parser = object({ repo: option("--repo", repoParser, { description: message`Path to the repository`, }), ref: option("--ref", refParser, { description: message`Git reference`, }),}); The factory function is where the dependency gets resolved. It receives theactual value the user provided for --repo and returns a parser that validatesagainst refs from that specific repository. Under the hood, Optique uses a three-phase parsing strategy: Parse all options in a first pass, collecting dependency values Call factory functions with the collected values to create concrete parsers Re-parse derived options using those dynamically created parsers This means both validation and completion work correctly—if the user hasalready typed --repo /some/path, the --ref completion will show refs fromthat path. Repository-aware completion with @optique/git The @optique/git package provides async value parsers that read from Gitrepositories. Combined with the dependency system, you can build CLIs withrepository-aware completion: import { command, dependency, message, object, option, string,} from "@optique/core";import { gitBranch } from "@optique/git";const repoParser = dependency(string());const branchParser = repoParser.deriveAsync({ metavar: "BRANCH", factory: (repoPath) => gitBranch({ dir: repoPath }), defaultValue: () => ".",});const checkout = command( "checkout", object({ repo: option("--repo", repoParser, { description: message`Path to the repository`, }), branch: option("--branch", branchParser, { description: message`Branch to checkout`, }), }),); Now when you type my-cli checkout --repo /path/to/project --branch <TAB>, thecompletion will show branches from /path/to/project. The defaultValue of"." means that if --repo isn't specified, it falls back to the currentdirectory. Multiple dependencies Sometimes a parser needs values from multiple options. The deriveFrom()function handles this: import { choice, dependency, deriveFrom, message, object, option,} from "@optique/core";function getAvailableServices(env: string, region: string): string[] { return [`${env}-api-${region}`, `${env}-web-${region}`];}const envParser = dependency(choice(["dev", "staging", "prod"] as const));const regionParser = dependency(choice(["us-east", "eu-west"] as const));const serviceParser = deriveFrom({ dependencies: [envParser, regionParser] as const, metavar: "SERVICE", factory: (env, region) => { const services = getAvailableServices(env, region); return choice(services); }, defaultValues: () => ["dev", "us-east"] as const,});const parser = object({ env: option("--env", envParser, { description: message`Deployment environment`, }), region: option("--region", regionParser, { description: message`Cloud region`, }), service: option("--service", serviceParser, { description: message`Service to deploy`, }),}); The factory receives values in the same order as the dependency array. Ifsome dependencies aren't provided, Optique uses the defaultValues. Async support Real-world dependency resolution often involves I/O—reading from Gitrepositories, querying APIs, accessing databases. Optique provides asyncvariants for these cases: import { dependency, string } from "@optique/core";import { gitBranch } from "@optique/git";const repoParser = dependency(string());const branchParser = repoParser.deriveAsync({ metavar: "BRANCH", factory: (repoPath) => gitBranch({ dir: repoPath }), defaultValue: () => ".",}); The @optique/git package uses isomorphic-git under the hood, sogitBranch(), gitTag(), and gitRef() all work in both Node.js and Deno. There's also deriveSync() for when you need to be explicit about synchronousbehavior, and deriveFromAsync() for multiple async dependencies. Wrapping up The dependency system lets you build CLIs where options are aware of eachother—not just for validation, but for shell completion too. You get typesafety throughout: TypeScript knows the relationship between your dependencysources and derived parsers, and invalid combinations are caught at compiletime. This is particularly useful for tools that interact with external systems wherethe set of valid values isn't known until runtime. Git repositories, cloudproviders, databases, container registries—anywhere the completion choicesdepend on context the user has already provided. This feature will be available in Optique 0.10.0. To try the pre-release: deno add jsr:@optique/core@0.10.0-dev.311 Or with npm: npm install @optique/core@0.10.0-dev.311 See the documentation for more details.

@hongminhee@hackers.pub

Consider Git's -C option:

git -C /path/to/repo checkout <TAB>

When you hit Tab, Git completes branch names from /path/to/repo, not your current directory. The completion is context-aware—it depends on the value of another option.

Most CLI parsers can't do this. They treat each option in isolation, so completion for --branch has no way of knowing the --repo value. You end up with two unpleasant choices: either show completions for all possible branches across all repositories (useless), or give up on completion entirely for these options.

Optique 0.10.0 introduces a dependency system that solves this problem while preserving full type safety.

Static dependencies with or()

Optique already handles certain kinds of dependent options via the or() combinator:

import { flag, object, option, or, string } from "@optique/core";

const outputOptions = or(
  object({
    json: flag("--json"),
    pretty: flag("--pretty"),
  }),
  object({
    csv: flag("--csv"),
    delimiter: option("--delimiter", string()),
  }),
);

TypeScript knows that if json is true, you'll have a pretty field, and if csv is true, you'll have a delimiter field. The parser enforces this at runtime, and shell completion will suggest --pretty only when --json is present.

This works well when the valid combinations are known at definition time. But it can't handle cases where valid values depend on runtime input—like branch names that vary by repository.

Runtime dependencies

Common scenarios include:

  • A deployment CLI where --environment affects which services are available
  • A database tool where --connection affects which tables can be completed
  • A cloud CLI where --project affects which resources are shown

In each case, you can't know the valid values until you know what the user typed for the dependency option. Optique 0.10.0 introduces dependency() and derive() to handle exactly this.

The dependency system

The core idea is simple: mark one option as a dependency source, then create derived parsers that use its value.

import {
  choice,
  dependency,
  message,
  object,
  option,
  string,
} from "@optique/core";

function getRefsFromRepo(repoPath: string): string[] {
  // In real code, this would read from the Git repository
  return ["main", "develop", "feature/login"];
}

// Mark as a dependency source
const repoParser = dependency(string());

// Create a derived parser
const refParser = repoParser.derive({
  metavar: "REF",
  factory: (repoPath) => {
    const refs = getRefsFromRepo(repoPath);
    return choice(refs);
  },
  defaultValue: () => ".",
});

const parser = object({
  repo: option("--repo", repoParser, {
    description: message`Path to the repository`,
  }),
  ref: option("--ref", refParser, {
    description: message`Git reference`,
  }),
});

The factory function is where the dependency gets resolved. It receives the actual value the user provided for --repo and returns a parser that validates against refs from that specific repository.

Under the hood, Optique uses a three-phase parsing strategy:

  1. Parse all options in a first pass, collecting dependency values
  2. Call factory functions with the collected values to create concrete parsers
  3. Re-parse derived options using those dynamically created parsers

This means both validation and completion work correctly—if the user has already typed --repo /some/path, the --ref completion will show refs from that path.

Repository-aware completion with @optique/git

The @optique/git package provides async value parsers that read from Git repositories. Combined with the dependency system, you can build CLIs with repository-aware completion:

import {
  command,
  dependency,
  message,
  object,
  option,
  string,
} from "@optique/core";
import { gitBranch } from "@optique/git";

const repoParser = dependency(string());

const branchParser = repoParser.deriveAsync({
  metavar: "BRANCH",
  factory: (repoPath) => gitBranch({ dir: repoPath }),
  defaultValue: () => ".",
});

const checkout = command(
  "checkout",
  object({
    repo: option("--repo", repoParser, {
      description: message`Path to the repository`,
    }),
    branch: option("--branch", branchParser, {
      description: message`Branch to checkout`,
    }),
  }),
);

Now when you type my-cli checkout --repo /path/to/project --branch <TAB>, the completion will show branches from /path/to/project. The defaultValue of "." means that if --repo isn't specified, it falls back to the current directory.

Multiple dependencies

Sometimes a parser needs values from multiple options. The deriveFrom() function handles this:

import {
  choice,
  dependency,
  deriveFrom,
  message,
  object,
  option,
} from "@optique/core";

function getAvailableServices(env: string, region: string): string[] {
  return [`${env}-api-${region}`, `${env}-web-${region}`];
}

const envParser = dependency(choice(["dev", "staging", "prod"] as const));
const regionParser = dependency(choice(["us-east", "eu-west"] as const));

const serviceParser = deriveFrom({
  dependencies: [envParser, regionParser] as const,
  metavar: "SERVICE",
  factory: (env, region) => {
    const services = getAvailableServices(env, region);
    return choice(services);
  },
  defaultValues: () => ["dev", "us-east"] as const,
});

const parser = object({
  env: option("--env", envParser, {
    description: message`Deployment environment`,
  }),
  region: option("--region", regionParser, {
    description: message`Cloud region`,
  }),
  service: option("--service", serviceParser, {
    description: message`Service to deploy`,
  }),
});

The factory receives values in the same order as the dependency array. If some dependencies aren't provided, Optique uses the defaultValues.

Async support

Real-world dependency resolution often involves I/O—reading from Git repositories, querying APIs, accessing databases. Optique provides async variants for these cases:

import { dependency, string } from "@optique/core";
import { gitBranch } from "@optique/git";

const repoParser = dependency(string());

const branchParser = repoParser.deriveAsync({
  metavar: "BRANCH",
  factory: (repoPath) => gitBranch({ dir: repoPath }),
  defaultValue: () => ".",
});

The @optique/git package uses isomorphic-git under the hood, so gitBranch(), gitTag(), and gitRef() all work in both Node.js and Deno.

There's also deriveSync() for when you need to be explicit about synchronous behavior, and deriveFromAsync() for multiple async dependencies.

Wrapping up

The dependency system lets you build CLIs where options are aware of each other—not just for validation, but for shell completion too. You get type safety throughout: TypeScript knows the relationship between your dependency sources and derived parsers, and invalid combinations are caught at compile time.

This is particularly useful for tools that interact with external systems where the set of valid values isn't known until runtime. Git repositories, cloud providers, databases, container registries—anywhere the completion choices depend on context the user has already provided.

This feature will be available in Optique 0.10.0. To try the pre-release:

deno add jsr:@optique/core@0.10.0-dev.311

Or with npm:

npm install @optique/core@0.10.0-dev.311

See the documentation for more details.

unstable.optique.dev

Inter-option dependencies | Optique

Inter-option dependencies allow one option's valid values to depend on another option's value, enabling dynamic validation and context-aware shell completion.

@nesroch@mastodon.online

① CJK 환경에서 리눅스의 사용편의성이 윈도에 비견될만한가?
 아니요, 아직 멀었음. 이건 전제로 두고 이야기를 시작함.
② 리눅스 시스템 관리에 CLI가 필수이거나 UAC가 켜져있는 윈도보다 더 크게 불편한 점이 있는가?
 전혀 아니요, 10년도 더 전에 리눅스 써보고 그 경험이 아직도 유효하다고 생각하시면 안 됨. 요즘 전부 GUI로 클릭 두세 번에 다 해결되고, 윈도랑 크게 차이도 안 남.
③ 리눅스 한국어 입력기에 근본적인 사용성 문제가 있는가?
 아니요, OOTB로 작동하지 않는 것 이외에, IBus나 Fcitx에 근본적인 사용성 문제가 있다는 생각은 한 번도 해본 적 없음.

@hongminhee@hackers.pub

Consider Git's -C option:

git -C /path/to/repo checkout <TAB>

When you hit Tab, Git completes branch names from /path/to/repo, not your current directory. The completion is context-aware—it depends on the value of another option.

Most CLI parsers can't do this. They treat each option in isolation, so completion for --branch has no way of knowing the --repo value. You end up with two unpleasant choices: either show completions for all possible branches across all repositories (useless), or give up on completion entirely for these options.

Optique 0.10.0 introduces a dependency system that solves this problem while preserving full type safety.

Static dependencies with or()

Optique already handles certain kinds of dependent options via the or() combinator:

import { flag, object, option, or, string } from "@optique/core";

const outputOptions = or(
  object({
    json: flag("--json"),
    pretty: flag("--pretty"),
  }),
  object({
    csv: flag("--csv"),
    delimiter: option("--delimiter", string()),
  }),
);

TypeScript knows that if json is true, you'll have a pretty field, and if csv is true, you'll have a delimiter field. The parser enforces this at runtime, and shell completion will suggest --pretty only when --json is present.

This works well when the valid combinations are known at definition time. But it can't handle cases where valid values depend on runtime input—like branch names that vary by repository.

Runtime dependencies

Common scenarios include:

  • A deployment CLI where --environment affects which services are available
  • A database tool where --connection affects which tables can be completed
  • A cloud CLI where --project affects which resources are shown

In each case, you can't know the valid values until you know what the user typed for the dependency option. Optique 0.10.0 introduces dependency() and derive() to handle exactly this.

The dependency system

The core idea is simple: mark one option as a dependency source, then create derived parsers that use its value.

import {
  choice,
  dependency,
  message,
  object,
  option,
  string,
} from "@optique/core";

function getRefsFromRepo(repoPath: string): string[] {
  // In real code, this would read from the Git repository
  return ["main", "develop", "feature/login"];
}

// Mark as a dependency source
const repoParser = dependency(string());

// Create a derived parser
const refParser = repoParser.derive({
  metavar: "REF",
  factory: (repoPath) => {
    const refs = getRefsFromRepo(repoPath);
    return choice(refs);
  },
  defaultValue: () => ".",
});

const parser = object({
  repo: option("--repo", repoParser, {
    description: message`Path to the repository`,
  }),
  ref: option("--ref", refParser, {
    description: message`Git reference`,
  }),
});

The factory function is where the dependency gets resolved. It receives the actual value the user provided for --repo and returns a parser that validates against refs from that specific repository.

Under the hood, Optique uses a three-phase parsing strategy:

  1. Parse all options in a first pass, collecting dependency values
  2. Call factory functions with the collected values to create concrete parsers
  3. Re-parse derived options using those dynamically created parsers

This means both validation and completion work correctly—if the user has already typed --repo /some/path, the --ref completion will show refs from that path.

Repository-aware completion with @optique/git

The @optique/git package provides async value parsers that read from Git repositories. Combined with the dependency system, you can build CLIs with repository-aware completion:

import {
  command,
  dependency,
  message,
  object,
  option,
  string,
} from "@optique/core";
import { gitBranch } from "@optique/git";

const repoParser = dependency(string());

const branchParser = repoParser.deriveAsync({
  metavar: "BRANCH",
  factory: (repoPath) => gitBranch({ dir: repoPath }),
  defaultValue: () => ".",
});

const checkout = command(
  "checkout",
  object({
    repo: option("--repo", repoParser, {
      description: message`Path to the repository`,
    }),
    branch: option("--branch", branchParser, {
      description: message`Branch to checkout`,
    }),
  }),
);

Now when you type my-cli checkout --repo /path/to/project --branch <TAB>, the completion will show branches from /path/to/project. The defaultValue of "." means that if --repo isn't specified, it falls back to the current directory.

Multiple dependencies

Sometimes a parser needs values from multiple options. The deriveFrom() function handles this:

import {
  choice,
  dependency,
  deriveFrom,
  message,
  object,
  option,
} from "@optique/core";

function getAvailableServices(env: string, region: string): string[] {
  return [`${env}-api-${region}`, `${env}-web-${region}`];
}

const envParser = dependency(choice(["dev", "staging", "prod"] as const));
const regionParser = dependency(choice(["us-east", "eu-west"] as const));

const serviceParser = deriveFrom({
  dependencies: [envParser, regionParser] as const,
  metavar: "SERVICE",
  factory: (env, region) => {
    const services = getAvailableServices(env, region);
    return choice(services);
  },
  defaultValues: () => ["dev", "us-east"] as const,
});

const parser = object({
  env: option("--env", envParser, {
    description: message`Deployment environment`,
  }),
  region: option("--region", regionParser, {
    description: message`Cloud region`,
  }),
  service: option("--service", serviceParser, {
    description: message`Service to deploy`,
  }),
});

The factory receives values in the same order as the dependency array. If some dependencies aren't provided, Optique uses the defaultValues.

Async support

Real-world dependency resolution often involves I/O—reading from Git repositories, querying APIs, accessing databases. Optique provides async variants for these cases:

import { dependency, string } from "@optique/core";
import { gitBranch } from "@optique/git";

const repoParser = dependency(string());

const branchParser = repoParser.deriveAsync({
  metavar: "BRANCH",
  factory: (repoPath) => gitBranch({ dir: repoPath }),
  defaultValue: () => ".",
});

The @optique/git package uses isomorphic-git under the hood, so gitBranch(), gitTag(), and gitRef() all work in both Node.js and Deno.

There's also deriveSync() for when you need to be explicit about synchronous behavior, and deriveFromAsync() for multiple async dependencies.

Wrapping up

The dependency system lets you build CLIs where options are aware of each other—not just for validation, but for shell completion too. You get type safety throughout: TypeScript knows the relationship between your dependency sources and derived parsers, and invalid combinations are caught at compile time.

This is particularly useful for tools that interact with external systems where the set of valid values isn't known until runtime. Git repositories, cloud providers, databases, container registries—anywhere the completion choices depend on context the user has already provided.

This feature will be available in Optique 0.10.0. To try the pre-release:

deno add jsr:@optique/core@0.10.0-dev.311

Or with npm:

npm install @optique/core@0.10.0-dev.311

See the documentation for more details.

unstable.optique.dev

Inter-option dependencies | Optique

Inter-option dependencies allow one option's valid values to depend on another option's value, enabling dynamic validation and context-aware shell completion.

@hongminhee@hollo.social

I've been working on a tricky problem in Optique (my CLI parser library): how do you make one option's value affect another option's validation and shell completion?

Think git -C <path> branch --delete <TAB>—the branch completions should come from the repo at <path>, not the current directory.

I think I've found a solution that fits naturally with Optique's architecture: declare dependencies between value parsers, then topologically sort them at parse time.

const cwdString = dependency(string());

const parser = object({
  cwd: optional(option("-C", cwdString)),
  branches: multiple(argument(
    cwdString.derive({
      metavar: "BRANCH",
      factory: dir => gitBranch({ dir }),
      defaultValue: () => process.cwd(),
    })
  )),
});

Details in the issue:

https://github.com/dahlia/optique/issues/74#issuecomment-3738381049

github.com

Support for inter-option dependencies in value parsers · Issue #74 · dahlia/optique

When building CLI tools that mirror Git's interface, it's common to have a global option like -C <path> that changes the working directory for subsequent operations. Ideally, value parsers (like gi...

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to marius

@mariusor I think there might be a misunderstanding here. The defaultValue function isn't the parser introspecting application logic—it's the opposite direction. The application injects the fallback behavior into the parser.

The parser doesn't need to know what that function does internally. It just calls it when the dependency option is absent. This is similar to dependency injection: the parser defines when to call the function, but the application defines what it does.

Without this, the alternative would be post-parse validation in application code, which loses the benefit of parse-time validation and, more importantly, shell completion—which was the original motivation for this feature.

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to marius

@mariusor That's a good point for the Git example! However, from Optique's perspective as a general-purpose CLI parser, I don't think we can always assume that.

Some cases where a default value isn't straightforward:

  • The dependency option might be required with no default (e.g., --database <name> for table completions)
  • The default might need async computation (e.g., auto-detecting a Git root by traversing up directories)
  • Computing the default might be expensive, so we'd want to defer it until we know the option wasn't provided

That's why the current design has an explicit defaultValue function as the second argument to derive()—it gives users control over what happens when the dependency option is absent.

@hongminhee@hollo.social

I've been working on a tricky problem in Optique (my CLI parser library): how do you make one option's value affect another option's validation and shell completion?

Think git -C <path> branch --delete <TAB>—the branch completions should come from the repo at <path>, not the current directory.

I think I've found a solution that fits naturally with Optique's architecture: declare dependencies between value parsers, then topologically sort them at parse time.

const cwdString = dependency(string());

const parser = object({
  cwd: optional(option("-C", cwdString)),
  branches: multiple(argument(
    cwdString.derive({
      metavar: "BRANCH",
      factory: dir => gitBranch({ dir }),
      defaultValue: () => process.cwd(),
    })
  )),
});

Details in the issue:

https://github.com/dahlia/optique/issues/74#issuecomment-3738381049

github.com

Support for inter-option dependencies in value parsers · Issue #74 · dahlia/optique

When building CLI tools that mirror Git's interface, it's common to have a global option like -C <path> that changes the working directory for subsequent operations. Ideally, value parsers (like gi...

@hongminhee@hollo.social

It seems like the Claude models normalize all curly quotes into straight quotes, which is incredibly annoying for someone like me who uses curly quotes all the time.

@bananamilk452@hackers.pub

요즘 fedify를 이용한 연합되는 블로그 만들기에 열 올리고 있는데... 참 재밌는 것 같아요. fedify도 참 잘 만든 라이브러리인 것 같구... 나중에 블로그 실서비스 하게 될 때가 기대되네요♡

@hongminhee@hollo.social

I've been boycotting Samsung for years now. People outside Korea often seem surprised when I mention this—after all, Samsung is one of the most recognizable Korean brands globally. So let me explain.

It started after I read Think Samsung (三星(삼성)을 생각한다) by Kim Yong-chul, a former Samsung lawyer turned whistleblower. The book exposed systematic corruption, slush funds, and how the conglomerate wielded its influence to evade accountability. It painted a picture of a company that operated as if it were above the law.

But what pushed me from mere dislike to active boycott was the 2015 merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries. This wasn't just questionable corporate governance—it was engineered to help Lee Jae-yong consolidate control of the Samsung empire. The merger ratio heavily undervalued Samsung C&T, and the National Pension Service, despite its fiduciary duty to Korean citizens, voted in favor of it. Korean pensioners lost billions.

The whole affair later became central to the corruption scandal that brought down President Park Geun-hye. Lee Jae-yong was convicted of bribery. And yet Samsung continues as if nothing happened.

I'm under no illusion that my personal boycott hurts Samsung in any meaningful way. But some things aren't about effectiveness. They're about not being complicit.

theinvestor.co.kr

NPS sees big losses after Samsung C&T merger

[THE INVESTOR] South Korea’s state-run pension fund has suffered huge valuation losses from its investment in two Samsung Group units as the stocks have plunged

@lamikennel@toot.blue · Reply to lamikennel

일본 쇼와 시대에는 미소라 히바리라는 국민적 가수가 계셨다. 그녀는 울면서도 노래할 수 있었는데, 이것은 어떤 특수한 훈련 덕분이라고 알려져 있었다.

Turns out writing markdownlint rules was the easy part. Actually fixing all those lint errors manually? That was unbearable.

So I did what any reasonable person would do: rewrote the whole thing as an auto-formatter. Meet Hongdown—now you can enforce my peculiar Markdown style without the pain.

https://github.com/dahlia/hongdown

github.com

GitHub - dahlia/hongdown: A Markdown formatter that enforces Hong Minhee's Markdown style conventions

A Markdown formatter that enforces Hong Minhee's Markdown style conventions - dahlia/hongdown

@hongminhee@hollo.social

I've been boycotting Samsung for years now. People outside Korea often seem surprised when I mention this—after all, Samsung is one of the most recognizable Korean brands globally. So let me explain.

It started after I read Think Samsung (三星(삼성)을 생각한다) by Kim Yong-chul, a former Samsung lawyer turned whistleblower. The book exposed systematic corruption, slush funds, and how the conglomerate wielded its influence to evade accountability. It painted a picture of a company that operated as if it were above the law.

But what pushed me from mere dislike to active boycott was the 2015 merger between Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries. This wasn't just questionable corporate governance—it was engineered to help Lee Jae-yong consolidate control of the Samsung empire. The merger ratio heavily undervalued Samsung C&T, and the National Pension Service, despite its fiduciary duty to Korean citizens, voted in favor of it. Korean pensioners lost billions.

The whole affair later became central to the corruption scandal that brought down President Park Geun-hye. Lee Jae-yong was convicted of bribery. And yet Samsung continues as if nothing happened.

I'm under no illusion that my personal boycott hurts Samsung in any meaningful way. But some things aren't about effectiveness. They're about not being complicit.

theinvestor.co.kr

NPS sees big losses after Samsung C&T merger

[THE INVESTOR] South Korea’s state-run pension fund has suffered huge valuation losses from its investment in two Samsung Group units as the stocks have plunged

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to Olivia Grace 🌸

@olivia Welcome to the world of Korean language! Learning hangul is the most important first step. I checked out your website—it's a great initiative! Don't worry about it being rough; building something is the best way to learn. I look forward to chatting with you in Korean someday! Fighting! (That means “cheer up” or “go for it” in Korean. 파이팅 or 화이팅 in hangul.)

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to Chee Aun 🤔

@cheeaun I considered it! But my requirements were pretty specific—like nuanced ordering for link references and footnotes based on their context. Building a custom formatter turned out simpler than trying to extend remark-lint for those edge cases.

Turns out writing markdownlint rules was the easy part. Actually fixing all those lint errors manually? That was unbearable.

So I did what any reasonable person would do: rewrote the whole thing as an auto-formatter. Meet Hongdown—now you can enforce my peculiar Markdown style without the pain.

https://github.com/dahlia/hongdown

github.com

GitHub - dahlia/hongdown: A Markdown formatter that enforces Hong Minhee's Markdown style conventions

A Markdown formatter that enforces Hong Minhee's Markdown style conventions - dahlia/hongdown

@hongminhee@hollo.social

I've always believed that structured logging shouldn't be complicated. Seeing Sentry echo this sentiment in their latest engineering blog post—and using LogTape to demonstrate it—is a massive validation for me.

They did a great job explaining why we need to move beyond console.log() in production. Really proud to see my work mentioned alongside such a standard-setting tool.

https://blog.sentry.io/trace-connected-structured-logging-with-logtape-and-sentry/

blog.sentry.io

LogTape & Sentry - Trace-Connected Structured Logging

Learn to add production-grade logging and error monitoring to your Next.js application with LogTape and Sentry.

@fancysandwiches@neuromatch.social

One of the ways I'm dealing with AI slop at work is that when I'm giving feedback on the work I'm making sure to never assign the responsibility of the bad code to the AI. I'm directly saying that "this change that YOU made needs to be corrected". I'm always assigning the output of the AI to the person who put me in the position of reviewing the work. It is their responsibility to read the code that they're trying to review, they are responsible for 100% of the code, so they also get 100% of the blame when it's bad. If a change is confusing or nonsensical I'll ask "why did YOU make this change?". I'll never ask why an AI made a change, that we cannot know. All we can know is why someone thought it was acceptable to ship garbage, and we can assign them the responsibility for the garbage that they're willing to ship

@fediversereport@mastodon.social

New from me: X is A Power Problem, Not a Platform Problem

connectedplaces.online/reports

The implicit theory behind the open social web was that platform quality would determine outcomes. Build something that’s better, and in combination with the incumbent getting worse, this would lead to such difference in quality, user experience and safety that at some point people would switch from X to alternatives like Mastodon or Bluesky. This theory held up for a while in 2023 and 2024. In 2025 it started to falter, as Musk aligned himself with Trump, the signup waves to the alternative platforms effectively stopped. In early 2026, this theory is now really over, because X has fundamentally changed. Mastodon and Bluesky are not in competition anymore with the platform X, because X has changed. It changed from being a platform to the power structure for the neo-royalty, with the public square shambling along as a zombie, animated by everyone who still treats X like it’s 2015.

You cannot out-compete ‘where the ruling faction radicalizes and coordinates’ by having better moderation policies or algorithmic choice. X is not a platform problem anymore, it is a power problem, and building a different platform does not solve the power problem.
ALT text

The implicit theory behind the open social web was that platform quality would determine outcomes. Build something that’s better, and in combination with the incumbent getting worse, this would lead to such difference in quality, user experience and safety that at some point people would switch from X to alternatives like Mastodon or Bluesky. This theory held up for a while in 2023 and 2024. In 2025 it started to falter, as Musk aligned himself with Trump, the signup waves to the alternative platforms effectively stopped. In early 2026, this theory is now really over, because X has fundamentally changed. Mastodon and Bluesky are not in competition anymore with the platform X, because X has changed. It changed from being a platform to the power structure for the neo-royalty, with the public square shambling along as a zombie, animated by everyone who still treats X like it’s 2015. You cannot out-compete ‘where the ruling faction radicalizes and coordinates’ by having better moderation policies or algorithmic choice. X is not a platform problem anymore, it is a power problem, and building a different platform does not solve the power problem.

@hongminhee@hollo.social

I've always believed that structured logging shouldn't be complicated. Seeing Sentry echo this sentiment in their latest engineering blog post—and using LogTape to demonstrate it—is a massive validation for me.

They did a great job explaining why we need to move beyond console.log() in production. Really proud to see my work mentioned alongside such a standard-setting tool.

https://blog.sentry.io/trace-connected-structured-logging-with-logtape-and-sentry/

blog.sentry.io

LogTape & Sentry - Trace-Connected Structured Logging

Learn to add production-grade logging and error monitoring to your Next.js application with LogTape and Sentry.

@silverpill@mitra.social