洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · 1032 following · 1621 followers

An intersectionalist, feminist, and socialist living in Seoul (UTC+09:00). @tokolovesme's spouse. Who's behind @fedify, @hollo, and @botkit. Write some free software in , , , & . They/them.

서울에 사는 交叉女性主義者이자 社會主義者. 金剛兔(@tokolovesme)의 配偶者. @fedify, @hollo, @botkit 메인테이너. , , , 等으로 自由 소프트웨어 만듦.

()

tesaguri 🦀🦝's avatar
tesaguri 🦀🦝

@tesaguri@fedibird.com

それはそれとしてThisIsMissEm大先生がグラントを得られたことは良い話である。同氏が長いこと資金難そうだったのは気掛かりだったし

Oto Šťáva's avatar
Oto Šťáva

@alefunguju@mastodon.social

> When legality is used as a substitute for a value judgment, the question that actually matters gets buried in the footnotes of a law it has already outgrown.

writings.hongminhee.org/2026/0

Vladimir Savić's avatar
Vladimir Savić

@firusvg@mastodon.social

Is legal the same as legitimate: reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft writings.hongminhee.org/2026/0

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to モナコ広告 :fedibird1: @技術・雑談's post

@monaco_koukoku ご報告ありがとうございます。まさに既知の問題で、先ほどGitHubのイシュー#472としてクローズされました。

問題の本質は、Delete(Actor)を送ってくるアクターはすでに削除済みであるため、署名検証に必要な公開鍵が取得できずFedifyが401 Unauthorizedを返してしまうことにあります。結果としてハンドラーが呼ばれないのは仕様どおりの動作ではあるのですが、Deleteの場合はそれが根本的に困るというわけです。

この問題は次のリリースのFedify 2.1.0で対処されます。InboxListenerSettersonUnverifiedActivity()というフックが追加され、署名検証に失敗したアクティビティをアプリケーション側でオプトインして処理できるようになります。詳しい使い方はドキュメントをご参照ください。

現在お使いのv1.10.3では残念ながら組み込みの回避策がありません。v2.1.0の正式リリースはまだですが、プレリリースビルドv2.1.0-dev.513+f5543fcaがすでにnpmおよびJSRに上がっていますので、今すぐ試すことも可能です。

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

海鮮丼を食べにつじ半に来た。

海鮮丼
ALT text details海鮮丼
🫧 socialcoding..'s avatar
🫧 socialcoding..

@smallcircles@social.coop

Legal vs. Legitimate, good article by @hongminhee

> Whatever courts eventually decide about AI reimplementation, the question we need to answer first is not a legal one. It is a social one. Do those who take from the commons owe something back? I think they do. That judgment does not require a verdict

"Can the commons expect something back from those who extract value?" is a key question of Social experience design. The answer forms one of 3 core principles: The Mindfulness principle.

No. You can't expect *anything* back. That philosophical insight is crucial to organizing a healthy commons that's able to retain its value and evolve.

Paint any principles and values on a flag but as long as the battle is scattered farmers holding feeble Copyright Law pitchforks against a vast drone army, its no use. Know thy enemy helps too. It's not proprietary code or corporations. It's hypercapitalism: The Rules of Battle.

writings.hongminhee.org/2026/0

news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4

coding.social/blog/reimagine-s

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social

I'm thinking of proposing a /social web community track at @COSCUP 2026 (Aug 8–9, Taipei)—think FOSDEM's Social Web devroom, but in East Asia. Before I submit the CFP, I'd love to get a sense of what to call it. What do you think?

(Boosts appreciated!)

OptionVoters
Fediverse29 (31%)
Social Web10 (11%)
Open Social Web22 (23%)
Fediverse & Social Web32 (34%)
Other (reply!)1 (1%)
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

最近(최근) chardet의 MIT 리라이선싱과 關聯(관련)해서 Redis의 antirez와 Flask의 Armin Ronacher(一名(일명) mitsuhiko)가 이를 擁護(옹호)하는 글을 썼는데, 그에 ()한 나름대로의 反論(반론)을 써 봤습니다: 〈合法(합법)이면 公正(공정)한가: AI 再具顯(재구현)과 카피레프트의 侵蝕(침식)〉(한글).

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

chardetのMITへの再ライセンスをめぐって、RedisのantirezとFlaskのArmin Ronacher(通称 mitsuhiko)がそれを擁護する文章を書いていたので、自分なりの反論を書いてみました。

https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/index.ja.html

Mitchell Hashimoto's avatar
Mitchell Hashimoto

@mitchellh@hachyderm.io

Ghostty 1.3 is now out! Scrollback search, native scrollbars, click-to-move cursor, rich clipboard copy, AppleScript, split drag/drop, Unicode 17 and international text improvements, massive performance improvements, and hundreds more changes. ghostty.org/docs/install/relea

Emelia 👸🏻's avatar
Emelia 👸🏻

@thisismissem@hachyderm.io · Reply to Emelia 👸🏻's post

Here's these posts in blog article form: writings.thisismissem.social/h

Chun's avatar
Chun

@hi@hcchiang.com

Title: Is legal the same as legitimate: AI reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft
Link: writings.hongminhee.org/2026/0

這篇文章討論了 chardet 這個 Python 編碼檢測庫在使用 AI 重寫後,授權和社會倫理問題的爭議。

### 文章翻譯與總結:

2026 年 3 月 9 日,chardet 庫的維護者 Dan Blanchard 發布了第 7.0 版本,此版本比之前快了 48 倍,並支持多核心,且重寫後完全新建,原始代碼相似度低於 1.3%。他聲稱藉由使用 AI(Anthropic 的 Claude)依照 API 和測試套件重寫,因而不受原 LGPL 授權約束,改採 MIT 授權。原作者 Mark Pilgrim 反對此作法,指出 LGPL 規定修改必須維持相同授權,且 AI 重寫並

Emelia's avatar
Emelia

@thisismissem@activitypub.space · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

@hongminhee@hollo.social said

The proposed solution is to split responsibility more aggressively: the C2S server should be nearly stateless and dumb, storing ActivityPub objects without interpreting them, while a separate “client” layer handles indexing, timelines, moderation, and exposes its own API to the frontend running on the user's device. It's a clean separation of concerns on paper.

This is exactly what I say in the talk that I still need to record, and why I was working on that ActivityPDS concept last september.

Gabriel Gasparolo's avatar
Gabriel Gasparolo

@ggasp@toot.io

Is legal the same as legitimate: AI reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft writings.hongminhee.org/2026/0

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

chardetのMITへの再ライセンスをめぐって、RedisのantirezとFlaskのArmin Ronacher(通称 mitsuhiko)がそれを擁護する文章を書いていたので、自分なりの反論を書いてみました。

https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/index.ja.html

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social

Salvatore Sanfilippo (@antirez) and Armin Ronacher (@mitsuhiko) both argue that reimplementation of libraries is fine. Their legal reasoning might be correct. That's not the point.

Legal and legitimate are different things—and both pieces quietly assume otherwise.

https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/

Venkatesh-Prasad Ranganath's avatar
Venkatesh-Prasad Ranganath

@orderwithchaos@mastodon.social

"Whatever courts eventually decide about AI reimplementation, the question we need to answer first is not a legal one. It is a social one. Do those who take from the commons owe something back?"

writings.hongminhee.org/2026/0

Arya N's avatar
Arya N

@null0x0@fosstodon.org

An excellent read

writings.hongminhee.org/2026/0

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to vappster's post

@vappster BotKit currently supports only a single bot per instance, but in the future releases, such limitation could be gone. See also this related issue: https://github.com/fedify-dev/botkit/issues/16.

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to Hyaniner's post

@hyaniner 읽어주셔서 고맙습니다!

Lobsters

@lobsters@mastodon.social

Is legal the same as legitimate: AI reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft by @hongminhee lobste.rs/s/52jd6f
writings.hongminhee.org/2026/0

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

最近(최근) chardet의 MIT 리라이선싱과 關聯(관련)해서 Redis의 antirez와 Flask의 Armin Ronacher(一名(일명) mitsuhiko)가 이를 擁護(옹호)하는 글을 썼는데, 그에 ()한 나름대로의 反論(반론)을 써 봤습니다: 〈合法(합법)이면 公正(공정)한가: AI 再具顯(재구현)과 카피레프트의 侵蝕(침식)〉(한글).

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social

Salvatore Sanfilippo (@antirez) and Armin Ronacher (@mitsuhiko) both argue that reimplementation of libraries is fine. Their legal reasoning might be correct. That's not the point.

Legal and legitimate are different things—and both pieces quietly assume otherwise.

https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/

Terence Eden's avatar
Terence Eden

@Edent@mastodon.social

Hey friends. Are there any new ActivityPub / Mastodon features I should add to ?

It's a small bot-only ActivityPub server in a single PHP file.

gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot/

It can be followed, post images, allow quote posts, etc.

Is there anything else you would like a bot-server to be able to do?

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social

오랜만에 中國(중국)에도 놀러 가고 싶네…

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

バーガー屋さんのSoul Grillに来た。

ドリフトコーラー
ALT text detailsドリフトコーラー
エッグベーコンバーガー
ALT text detailsエッグベーコンバーガー
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

高尾山口駅まで来た。

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

豆腐料理店の空野に来た。

前菜
ALT text details前菜
豆腐づくりセット
ALT text details豆腐づくりセット
wakest ⁂'s avatar
wakest ⁂

@liaizon@social.wake.st

RE: social.coop/@scottjenson/11619

I think this every time, but also I think most of the time it's actually from older versions of mastodon, software that doesn't support the feature or or posts made before the feature existed.

Scott Jenson's avatar
Scott Jenson

@scottjenson@social.coop

When I see a really good post and want to quote post it, I'm sad when quoting is disabled. I get it, it's their choice and I respect that.

But the ux designer in me can't help but to wonder if they didnt get the setting right and are missing out on positive engagement.

ConfConf's avatar
ConfConf

@confconf@fosstodon.org

ConfConf 2026 has been announced!

Website: confconf.org/

What: A free conference for organisers of conferences around free and open source software and hardware, and the surrounding ecosphere

Dates: June 6&7 2026

Location: Sofia, Bulgaria

Cost: free, supported by FOSDEM and Grafana Labs

If you are a conference organiser of a conference in FOSS ecosphere and would like to attend, reach out to request a voucher.

Older →