tesaguri 🦀🦝
@tesaguri@fedibird.com
それはそれとしてThisIsMissEm大先生がグラントを得られたことは良い話である。同氏が長いこと資金難そうだったのは気掛かりだったし


@hongminhee@hollo.social · 1032 following · 1621 followers
An intersectionalist, feminist, and socialist living in Seoul (UTC+09:00). @tokolovesme's spouse. Who's behind @fedify, @hollo, and @botkit. Write some free software in #TypeScript, #Haskell, #Rust, & #Python. They/them.
서울에 사는 交叉女性主義者이자 社會主義者. 金剛兔(@tokolovesme)의 配偶者. @fedify, @hollo, @botkit 메인테이너. #TypeScript, #Haskell, #Rust, #Python 等으로 自由 소프트웨어 만듦.
| Website | GitHub | Blog | Hackers' Pub |
|---|---|---|---|
@tesaguri@fedibird.com
それはそれとしてThisIsMissEm大先生がグラントを得られたことは良い話である。同氏が長いこと資金難そうだったのは気掛かりだったし
@alefunguju@mastodon.social
> When legality is used as a substitute for a value judgment, the question that actually matters gets buried in the footnotes of a law it has already outgrown.
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/
@firusvg@mastodon.social
Is legal the same as legitimate: #AI reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate #licensing #copyright

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to モナコ広告 :fedibird1: @技術・雑談's post
@monaco_koukoku ご報告ありがとうございます。まさに既知の問題で、先ほどGitHubのイシュー#472としてクローズされました。
問題の本質は、Delete(Actor)を送ってくるアクターはすでに削除済みであるため、署名検証に必要な公開鍵が取得できずFedifyが401 Unauthorizedを返してしまうことにあります。結果としてハンドラーが呼ばれないのは仕様どおりの動作ではあるのですが、Deleteの場合はそれが根本的に困るというわけです。
この問題は次のリリースのFedify 2.1.0で対処されます。InboxListenerSettersにonUnverifiedActivity()というフックが追加され、署名検証に失敗したアクティビティをアプリケーション側でオプトインして処理できるようになります。詳しい使い方はドキュメントをご参照ください。
現在お使いのv1.10.3では残念ながら組み込みの回避策がありません。v2.1.0の正式リリースはまだですが、プレリリースビルドv2.1.0-dev.513+f5543fcaがすでにnpmおよびJSRに上がっていますので、今すぐ試すことも可能です。

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
海鮮丼を食べにつじ半に来た。
@smallcircles@social.coop
Legal vs. Legitimate, good article by @hongminhee
> Whatever courts eventually decide about AI reimplementation, the question we need to answer first is not a legal one. It is a social one. Do those who take from the commons owe something back? I think they do. That judgment does not require a verdict
"Can the commons expect something back from those who extract value?" is a key question of Social experience design. The answer forms one of 3 core principles: The Mindfulness principle.
No. You can't expect *anything* back. That philosophical insight is crucial to organizing a healthy commons that's able to retain its value and evolve.
Paint any principles and values on a flag but as long as the battle is scattered farmers holding feeble Copyright Law pitchforks against a vast drone army, its no use. Know thy enemy helps too. It's not proprietary code or corporations. It's hypercapitalism: The Rules of Battle.
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47310160
https://coding.social/blog/reimagine-social/#chaordic-organization

@hongminhee@hollo.social
I'm thinking of proposing a #fediverse/social web community track at @COSCUP 2026 (Aug 8–9, Taipei)—think FOSDEM's Social Web devroom, but in East Asia. Before I submit the CFP, I'd love to get a sense of what to call it. What do you think?
(Boosts appreciated!)
| Option | Voters |
|---|---|
| Fediverse | 29 (31%) |
| Social Web | 10 (11%) |
| Open Social Web | 22 (23%) |
| Fediverse & Social Web | 32 (34%) |
| Other (reply!) | 1 (1%) |

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
最近 chardet의 MIT 리라이선싱과 關聯해서 Redis의 antirez와 Flask의 Armin Ronacher(一名 mitsuhiko)가 이를 擁護하는 글을 썼는데, 그에 對한 나름대로의 反論을 써 봤습니다: 〈合法이면 公正한가: AI 再具顯과 카피레프트의 侵蝕〉(한글).

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
chardetのMITへの再ライセンスをめぐって、RedisのantirezとFlaskのArmin Ronacher(通称 mitsuhiko)がそれを擁護する文章を書いていたので、自分なりの反論を書いてみました。
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/index.ja.html
@mitchellh@hachyderm.io
Ghostty 1.3 is now out! Scrollback search, native scrollbars, click-to-move cursor, rich clipboard copy, AppleScript, split drag/drop, Unicode 17 and international text improvements, massive performance improvements, and hundreds more changes. https://ghostty.org/docs/install/release-notes/1-3-0
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io · Reply to Emelia 👸🏻's post
Here's these posts in blog article form: https://writings.thisismissem.social/how-standards-are-made/
@hi@hcchiang.com
Title: Is legal the same as legitimate: AI reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft
Link: https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/
這篇文章討論了 chardet 這個 Python 編碼檢測庫在使用 AI 重寫後,授權和社會倫理問題的爭議。
### 文章翻譯與總結:
2026 年 3 月 9 日,chardet 庫的維護者 Dan Blanchard 發布了第 7.0 版本,此版本比之前快了 48 倍,並支持多核心,且重寫後完全新建,原始代碼相似度低於 1.3%。他聲稱藉由使用 AI(Anthropic 的 Claude)依照 API 和測試套件重寫,因而不受原 LGPL 授權約束,改採 MIT 授權。原作者 Mark Pilgrim 反對此作法,指出 LGPL 規定修改必須維持相同授權,且 AI 重寫並
@thisismissem@activitypub.space · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
The proposed solution is to split responsibility more aggressively: the C2S server should be nearly stateless and dumb, storing ActivityPub objects without interpreting them, while a separate “client” layer handles indexing, timelines, moderation, and exposes its own API to the frontend running on the user's device. It's a clean separation of concerns on paper.
This is exactly what I say in the talk that I still need to record, and why I was working on that ActivityPDS concept last september.
@ggasp@toot.io
Is legal the same as legitimate: AI reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
chardetのMITへの再ライセンスをめぐって、RedisのantirezとFlaskのArmin Ronacher(通称 mitsuhiko)がそれを擁護する文章を書いていたので、自分なりの反論を書いてみました。
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/index.ja.html

@hongminhee@hollo.social
Salvatore Sanfilippo (@antirez) and Armin Ronacher (@mitsuhiko) both argue that #AI reimplementation of #copyleft libraries is fine. Their legal reasoning might be correct. That's not the point.
Legal and legitimate are different things—and both pieces quietly assume otherwise.
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/
@orderwithchaos@mastodon.social
@null0x0@fosstodon.org

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to vappster's post
@vappster BotKit currently supports only a single bot per instance, but in the future releases, such limitation could be gone. See also this related issue: https://github.com/fedify-dev/botkit/issues/16.

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to Hyaniner's post
@hyaniner 읽어주셔서 고맙습니다!
@lobsters@mastodon.social
Is legal the same as legitimate: AI reimplementation and the erosion of copyleft by @hongminhee https://lobste.rs/s/52jd6f #law #vibecoding
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
最近 chardet의 MIT 리라이선싱과 關聯해서 Redis의 antirez와 Flask의 Armin Ronacher(一名 mitsuhiko)가 이를 擁護하는 글을 썼는데, 그에 對한 나름대로의 反論을 써 봤습니다: 〈合法이면 公正한가: AI 再具顯과 카피레프트의 侵蝕〉(한글).

@hongminhee@hollo.social
Salvatore Sanfilippo (@antirez) and Armin Ronacher (@mitsuhiko) both argue that #AI reimplementation of #copyleft libraries is fine. Their legal reasoning might be correct. That's not the point.
Legal and legitimate are different things—and both pieces quietly assume otherwise.
https://writings.hongminhee.org/2026/03/legal-vs-legitimate/
@Edent@mastodon.social
Hey #ActivityPub friends. Are there any new ActivityPub / Mastodon features I should add to #ActivityBot?
It's a small bot-only ActivityPub server in a single PHP file.
https://gitlab.com/edent/activity-bot/
It can be followed, post images, allow quote posts, etc.
Is there anything else you would like a bot-server to be able to do?

@hongminhee@hollo.social
오랜만에 中國에도 놀러 가고 싶네…

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
バーガー屋さんのSoul Grillに来た。

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
高尾山口駅まで来た。

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post
豆腐料理店の空野に来た。
@liaizon@social.wake.st
RE: https://social.coop/@scottjenson/116194411751413071
I think this every time, but also I think most of the time it's actually from older versions of mastodon, software that doesn't support the feature or or posts made before the feature existed.
@scottjenson@social.coop
When I see a really good post and want to quote post it, I'm sad when quoting is disabled. I get it, it's their choice and I respect that.
But the ux designer in me can't help but to wonder if they didnt get the setting right and are missing out on positive engagement.
@confconf@fosstodon.org
ConfConf 2026 has been announced!
Website: https://confconf.org/
What: A free conference for organisers of conferences around free and open source software and hardware, and the surrounding ecosphere
Dates: June 6&7 2026
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Cost: free, supported by FOSDEM and Grafana Labs
If you are a conference organiser of a conference in FOSS ecosphere and would like to attend, reach out to request a voucher.