洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

Or, just use a proper JSON-LD processor altogether. Of course, there would be a performance penalty. The spec explicitly allows as:Public or bare Public for public addressing in to/cc, etc., but surprisingly many implementations don't handle this. All of this would actually be solved by using a JSON-LD processor.

洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:'s post

Honestly, I don't really care what strategy other implementations follow to comply with the spec. (I solved it in by just using a proper JSON-LD processor.) It's just a bit annoying that I always send valid JSON-LD documents, but whenever I encounter an interoperability bug where the other side can't process them, I'm the one who has to send them a patch to fix it. 😩