Most #ActivityPub implementations include Mention objects in the tag attribute when someone mentions another actor within the content of a Note or Article. Should actor objects like Person or Group also include Mention objects in their tag attribute when mentioning other actors within their bio (summary)? Are there any implementations that already work this way? (I've checked Mastodon and it seems they don't include these mentions.) What are your thoughts on this?

#fediverse #fedidev

大部分(대부분)의 #ActivityPub 具顯(구현)들이 Note나 Article의 內容(내용) (content) 안에서 누군가 다른 액터를 멘션할 境遇(경우) tag 屬性(속성)으로 該當(해당)하는 Mention 客體(객체)들을 包含(포함)시킵니다. 그러면 Person, Group 等(등) 액터 客體(객체)들도 略歷(약력) (summary) 안에서 누군가 다른 액터를 멘션할 境遇(경우) tag 屬性(속성)으로 該當(해당)하는 Mention 客體(객체)들을 包含(포함)해야 할까요? 或是(혹시) 이미 그렇게 動作(동작)하는 具顯(구현)이 있을까요? (Mastodon은 確認(확인)해 본 結果(결과) 包含(포함)시키지 않는 것 같습니다만.) 어떻게 보시나요?

#연합우주 #聯合宇宙(연합우주) #fedidev

Hi @hongminhee,
maybe the bio should rather be a reference to any other AP object, e.g. a regular note.

@hongminhee yes. I can't think of a reason to have different behaviour for certain properties (like tag) based on the type of ActivityPub object.

@hongminhee Oh, Mastodon doesn't add a Mention object for profile summary mentions? I wonder if that's even intentional, since it does add hashtag references there.

I think it would make sense to have them. On the receiving side, it helps enrich link context and provides information on which links can be made server-local. (Mastodon's behavior on this is weird. Unlike mentions in posts, mentions in bios have unchanged URLs, but clicking them in the web UI loads them server-locally anyway.)

@hongminhee@hollo.social maybe look at #Friendica and #Hubzilla ?

@hongminhee @cheeaun

If it is allowed, there seems to be only an upside to doing so.