洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)'s avatar
洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)

@[email protected]

HolloをBunで動かしていた時は1GBから8GBのメモリを不安定に使っていたが、Node.jsに乗り換えた後は大体1GB程度のメモリしか使わなく成った。ピーク時には3GBまで消費する事も有るが、全体的なテスト期間に比べれば一瞬の事である。

Hollo 0.4.0からはBunの代わりにNode.jsを使う予定。

https://hollo.social/@hollo/0193ef5e-e922-7dbc-9b98-6c4d1efff067

Hollo's avatar
Hollo

@[email protected] · Reply to Hollo's post

Okay, testing with .js is cruising along. It's consuming up to 3 GB of memory at peak times, but that's a huge improvement over Hollo with , which was consuming over 8 GB of memory at peak times.

So, yes, starting with Hollo 0.4.0, we'll use Node.js instead of Bun!

Memory usage chart for the hollo.social server. You can see that before December 18th, the point at which we switched to Node.js, the memory usage fluctuated between 1 GB and 8 GB, but since then, it's been mostly stable around 1 GB. It did spike to 3 GB at peak times, but only briefly during the entire test period.
Memory usage chart for the hollo.social server. You can see that before December 18th, the point at which we switched to Node.js, the memory usage fluctuated between 1 GB and 8 GB, but since then, it's been mostly stable around 1 GB. It did spike to 3 GB at peak times, but only briefly during the entire test period.
Okiki Ojo's avatar
Okiki Ojo

@[email protected] · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee)'s post

@hongminhee

Korean: 이전에 영어가 어려우시다고 언급하셨기에, 이해하시기 더 편하시도록 한국어로 번역했습니다:

Deno가 이 지표에서 어떻게 성능을 발휘하는지 궁금합니다. 메모리 관리 측면에서 더 나은가요, 아니면 더 나쁜가요?

English: You mentioned in an earlier post that you were struggling with English, so I translated this to Korean to hopefully make it easier hollo.social/@hongminhee/0193d

I'm curious how Deno performs in this metric, is it better or worse at managing memory?