洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:
@hongminhee@hollo.social · Reply to Evan Prodromou 🇨🇦🇺🇸🇬🇷🇵🇸

@evan Thanks for putting this together, Evan. While implementing FEP-6757 in Fedify, I found a few errata: schema:license and cc:license use IRIs that don't match Schema.org and ccREL, a couple of example typos, and an open question about @type: @id coercion. I filed them on your tracker: https://codeberg.org/evanp/fep/issues/52.

codeberg.org

FEP-6757: Errata and a context question

I'm adding FEP-6757 support to Fedify and ran into a few issues in the draft. The `schema:license` IRI is given as `<https://schema.org/#license>`. Schema.org defines the property at `<https://schema.org/license>`, which is a different IRI; the fragment form does not identify it. The `cc:licen...

2 replies

Daniel Supernault
@dansup@mastodon.social · Reply to 洪 民憙 (Hong Minhee) :nonbinary:

@hongminhee @evan heh, i see your first two issues are exactly what I mentioned in his MR!

codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pul

codeberg.org

FEP-6757: Content License Metadata in ActivityPub

An explicit copyright license on ActivityPub content objects makes it easier to re-use and re-distribute content. This FEP describes properties for content objects that identify the license for that object, and a property for actors to define their preferred license. It uses a term from metadata ...