@evan Thanks for all the detail, this is really helpful context. I didn't realize the CfC process on the mailing list carried that much weight, that alone changes how I'd describe the participation options to people here.

I'm happy to read over the Korean version for style, though depending on how long the document ends up being it might take me a bit. For Japanese I should say upfront that I'm not a native speaker, so I'd rather not be the one vouching for naturalness there. @tesaguri would be a much better fit for that, if they're up for it.

2 likes