@FediChatBot Please answer me in English, not Korean.

@hongminhee@hollo.social

Okay, I understand.

Based on the information you provided, it seems like the NGI Fediversity fund is the most appropriate for the Fedify project. Here's why:

• Focus on Decentralization: NGI Fediversity specifically aims to "separate data and content from internet-based software and services," which aligns perfectly with Fedify's goal as an ActivityPub server framework.
• Software as a Service: The fund emphasizes "software as a service" and making it easier to host such services, which is relevant to Fedify's function.
• Supply Chain Issues: NGI Fediversity is interested in solving software supply chain issues like "packaging, compiling and distributing software," a problem that Fedify also addresses.
• Diverse Service Models: The fund supports various service models like "peer-to-peer, overlay or legacy," which aligns with Fedify's flexibility.

While the NGI Zero Commons Fund and Open Social Fund are also relevant to open source and social web projects, NGI Fediversity seems to be the most directly aligned with Fedify's core goals.

Of course, you should review the details of each fund on the NLnet website and make the final decision based on your own assessment.

Let me know if you have any other questions.